{
  "attachments": [],
  "comments_archived": true,
  "date": "2004-09-17T13:32:30.000Z",
  "excerpt": "Wow.  So it looks like there are some people starting to follow to what I'm doing with dbagg3, and they're showing me how woefully prepared I am for the attention from tinkerers who are actually trying to, you know, run my code.",
  "layout": "post",
  "tags": [
    "syndication",
    "xml"
  ],
  "title": "dbagg3: Please excuse the mess",
  "wordpress_id": 549,
  "wordpress_slug": "dbagg3mess",
  "wordpress_url": "http://www.decafbad.com/blog/?p=549",
  "year": "2004",
  "month": "09",
  "day": "17",
  "isDir": false,
  "slug": "dbagg3mess",
  "type": "entry",
  "postName": "2004-09-17-dbagg3mess",
  "html": "<p>Wow.  So it looks like there are some people starting to follow to what I'm doing with <code>dbagg3</code>, and they're showing me how woefully prepared I am for the attention from tinkerers who are actually trying to, you know, <strong>run</strong> my code.  Things have been crazy busy for me at work, so I haven't been getting done what I've planned.  But, I do need to pull a few things together and clean a few things up.  I'll soon be answering the smattering of email I've gotten so far, but until then, a few quick thoughts:</p>\n<ul>\n<li><p>My source control is a bit of a mess at the moment.  Not only have I <a href=\"http://www.decafbad.com/blog/2004/09/16/moving_time_from_cvs_to_subversion\">switched from CVS to SVN</a>-- but even if you followed me in that migration, I've not kept committed code in working order.  I already know that this is a horrible habit, but since no one's really been looking, I haven't been called on it until now.  (Heh, heh--d'oh.)  Planning this weekend (but hopefully today) to resolve this, so that moving forward, svn trunk will be (as far as possible) in a working state at any given moment.</p>\n</li>\n<li><p>I've hacked one of my dependencies, SQLObject, by applying <a href=\"http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=9122066\">a patch</a> to support SELECT DISTINCT queries.  This has understandably caused problems for some people who have no idea what I did.  This patch has turned out to be essential, though I don't know if/when it will or would be included in a release of SQLObject.  So...  I wonder if I should dump my working copy of SQLObject into source control?  Otherwise, applying the DISTINCT patch to your SQLObject install should work.</p>\n</li>\n<li><p>At some point very soon, I want to change the name of this thing to <strong>feedReactor</strong>.  Yes, I know there's already a <em>feedparser</em>, and a <em>feeddemon</em>, and a <em>feedburner</em>, and someone's probably got a <em>feedkitchensink</em> in the works, but I like this name and want to run with it.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<p>So, in the meantime while I straighten some things out, please excuse the mess and thanks for bearing with me!</p>\n<!--more-->\n\n\n<p>shortname=dbagg3mess</p>\n<div id=\"comments\" class=\"comments archived-comments\"><h3>Archived Comments</h3>\n<ul class=\"comments\">\n<li class=\"comment\" id=\"comment-221083379\">\n<div class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"author\">\n<a class=\"avatar image\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"\"><img src=\"http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=1229fe3e2959517f522393889bedbf61&amp;size=32&amp;default=http://mediacdn.disqus.com/1320279820/images/noavatar32.png\" width=\"\" height=\"\"></a>\n<a class=\"avatar name\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"\">Christian Henz</a>\n</div>\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#comment-221083379\" class=\"permalink\"><time datetime=\"2004-09-18T06:25:13\">2004-09-18T06:25:13</time></a></p>\n</div>\n\n\n<div class=\"content\">I think having a copy of your SQLObject tree would be most helpful.\nFirst of all, that patch applies (or at least _did_ apply a few weeks ago) to their development version, while you're using the 0.5 Version, right? \nI also 'back-ported' the patch to 0.5.2 (only the distinct part though), but I'm still getting errors...\ncheers,\nChristian</div>\n\n\n</li>\n<li class=\"comment\" id=\"comment-221083380\">\n<div class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"author\">\n<a class=\"avatar image\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"\"><img src=\"http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=1229fe3e2959517f522393889bedbf61&amp;size=32&amp;default=http://mediacdn.disqus.com/1320279820/images/noavatar32.png\" width=\"\" height=\"\"></a>\n<a class=\"avatar name\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"\">Christian Henz</a>\n</div>\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#comment-221083380\" class=\"permalink\"><time datetime=\"2004-09-18T07:28:15\">2004-09-18T07:28:15</time></a></p>\n</div>\n\n\n<div class=\"content\">Woops, just tried it again with a fresh svn-upped dbagg3 and it seems to work now.\nGood stuff :-)\ncheers,\nChristian</div>\n\n\n</li>\n</ul>\n\n\n</div>\n\n\n",
  "body": "Wow.  So it looks like there are some people starting to follow to what I'm doing with `dbagg3`, and they're showing me how woefully prepared I am for the attention from tinkerers who are actually trying to, you know, **run** my code.  Things have been crazy busy for me at work, so I haven't been getting done what I've planned.  But, I do need to pull a few things together and clean a few things up.  I'll soon be answering the smattering of email I've gotten so far, but until then, a few quick thoughts:\r\n\r\n* My source control is a bit of a mess at the moment.  Not only have I [switched from CVS to SVN][svnswitch]-- but even if you followed me in that migration, I've not kept committed code in working order.  I already know that this is a horrible habit, but since no one's really been looking, I haven't been called on it until now.  (Heh, heh--d'oh.)  Planning this weekend (but hopefully today) to resolve this, so that moving forward, svn trunk will be (as far as possible) in a working state at any given moment.\r\n\r\n* I've hacked one of my dependencies, SQLObject, by applying [a patch][sodistinct] to support SELECT DISTINCT queries.  This has understandably caused problems for some people who have no idea what I did.  This patch has turned out to be essential, though I don't know if/when it will or would be included in a release of SQLObject.  So...  I wonder if I should dump my working copy of SQLObject into source control?  Otherwise, applying the DISTINCT patch to your SQLObject install should work.\r\n\r\n* At some point very soon, I want to change the name of this thing to **feedReactor**.  Yes, I know there's already a *feedparser*, and a *feeddemon*, and a *feedburner*, and someone's probably got a *feedkitchensink* in the works, but I like this name and want to run with it.\r\n\r\nSo, in the meantime while I straighten some things out, please excuse the mess and thanks for bearing with me!\r\n\r\n[sodistinct]: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=9122066\r\n[svnswitch]: http://www.decafbad.com/blog/2004/09/16/moving_time_from_cvs_to_subversion\r\n<!--more-->\r\nshortname=dbagg3mess\r\n\r\n<div id=\"comments\" class=\"comments archived-comments\">\r\n            <h3>Archived Comments</h3>\r\n            \r\n        <ul class=\"comments\">\r\n            \r\n        <li class=\"comment\" id=\"comment-221083379\">\r\n            <div class=\"meta\">\r\n                <div class=\"author\">\r\n                    <a class=\"avatar image\" rel=\"nofollow\" \r\n                       href=\"\"><img src=\"http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=1229fe3e2959517f522393889bedbf61&amp;size=32&amp;default=http://mediacdn.disqus.com/1320279820/images/noavatar32.png\"/></a>\r\n                    <a class=\"avatar name\" rel=\"nofollow\" \r\n                       href=\"\">Christian Henz</a>\r\n                </div>\r\n                <a href=\"#comment-221083379\" class=\"permalink\"><time datetime=\"2004-09-18T06:25:13\">2004-09-18T06:25:13</time></a>\r\n            </div>\r\n            <div class=\"content\">I think having a copy of your SQLObject tree would be most helpful.\r\n\r\nFirst of all, that patch applies (or at least _did_ apply a few weeks ago) to their development version, while you're using the 0.5 Version, right? \r\n\r\nI also 'back-ported' the patch to 0.5.2 (only the distinct part though), but I'm still getting errors...\r\n\r\n\r\ncheers,\r\nChristian</div>\r\n            \r\n        </li>\r\n    \r\n        <li class=\"comment\" id=\"comment-221083380\">\r\n            <div class=\"meta\">\r\n                <div class=\"author\">\r\n                    <a class=\"avatar image\" rel=\"nofollow\" \r\n                       href=\"\"><img src=\"http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=1229fe3e2959517f522393889bedbf61&amp;size=32&amp;default=http://mediacdn.disqus.com/1320279820/images/noavatar32.png\"/></a>\r\n                    <a class=\"avatar name\" rel=\"nofollow\" \r\n                       href=\"\">Christian Henz</a>\r\n                </div>\r\n                <a href=\"#comment-221083380\" class=\"permalink\"><time datetime=\"2004-09-18T07:28:15\">2004-09-18T07:28:15</time></a>\r\n            </div>\r\n            <div class=\"content\">Woops, just tried it again with a fresh svn-upped dbagg3 and it seems to work now.\r\n\r\nGood stuff :-)\r\n\r\ncheers,\r\nChristian</div>\r\n            \r\n        </li>\r\n    \r\n        </ul>\r\n    \r\n        </div>\r\n    ",
  "parentPath": "./content/posts/archives/2004",
  "path": "2004/09/17/dbagg3mess",
  "summary": "Wow.  So it looks like there are some people starting to follow to what I'm doing with dbagg3, and they're showing me how woefully prepared I am for the attention from tinkerers who are actually trying to, you know, run my code.  Things have been crazy busy for me at work, so I haven't been getting done what I've planned.  But, I do need to pull a few things together and clean a few things up.  I'll soon be answering the smattering of email I've gotten so far, but until then, a few quick thoughts:\n\nMy source control is a bit of a mess at the moment.  Not only have I switched from CVS to SVN-- but even if you followed me in that migration, I've not kept committed code in working order.  I already know that this is a horrible habit, but since no one's really been looking, I haven't been called on it until now.  (Heh, heh--d'oh.)  Planning this weekend (but hopefully today) to resolve this, so that moving forward, svn trunk will be (as far as possible) in a working state at any given moment.\n\nI've hacked one of my dependencies, SQLObject, by applying a patch to support SELECT DISTINCT queries.  This has understandably caused problems for some people who have no idea what I did.  This patch has turned out to be essential, though I don't know if/when it will or would be included in a release of SQLObject.  So...  I wonder if I should dump my working copy of SQLObject into source control?  Otherwise, applying the DISTINCT patch to your SQLObject install should work.\n\nAt some point very soon, I want to change the name of this thing to feedReactor.  Yes, I know there's already a feedparser, and a feeddemon, and a feedburner, and someone's probably got a feedkitchensink in the works, but I like this name and want to run with it.\n\n\nSo, in the meantime while I straighten some things out, please excuse the mess and thanks for bearing with me!",
  "needsBuild": true,
  "prevPostPath": "2004/09/16/moving-time-from-cvs-to-subversion",
  "prevPostTitle": "Moving time: From CVS to Subversion",
  "nextPostPath": "2004/09/17/are-powerbook-hard-drives-supposed-to-sound-like-amiga-floppy-drives",
  "nextPostTitle": "Are PowerBook hard drives supposed to sound like Amiga floppy drives?"
}